- Daily Refill
- Posts
- Why "Strategic Good Enough" Outperforms Perfection Every Time
Why "Strategic Good Enough" Outperforms Perfection Every Time
Why 'good enough' beats perfect (counterintuitive but true)
Here's what I learned the hard way about perfectionism: it's not protecting your reputation—it's destroying it.
After tracking my perfectionist habits for a month, I discovered something shocking. Those extra hours spent "perfecting" work? Nobody noticed. But they definitely noticed when projects were late.
The breakthrough came when I embraced what I call "Strategic Good Enough".
Here's why it works:
Clients value reliability over perfection. Consider two consultants: one delivers solid proposals on time, another creates beautiful proposals two days late. The reliable one gets more referrals every time.
Most perfectionism is invisible. You agonize over details no one else sees. Real client feedback focuses on responsiveness, clarity, and helpfulness—never perfect formatting or exhaustive research.
"Good enough" creates compound advantages. The time you reclaim from over-polishing goes toward client development, strategic thinking, and mental bandwidth for innovation. Your work often improves because you're thinking bigger.
Being disagreeable about impossible standards makes you magnetic. People trust disagreeable individuals more because they appear genuine. When you set boundaries around perfectionism, you paradoxically become more attractive to work with.
The math is simple: your "good enough" is usually someone else's "more than I hoped for."
Excellence isn't about perfection. It's about smart choices with finite resources. When you optimize for impact instead of impression, you don't just save time—you reclaim your life.
Want the complete system? My Substack has the full perfectionism framework, including the psychology behind it and a 30-day implementation plan.
Until next time,
Matt
Reply